Video summary
¿Cuánto pagas por invertir? + Simulador de comisiones
Main summary
Key takeaways
Core idea / recommendation
- The video proposes a free simulator to estimate what you actually pay to trade via brokers in Argentina, including all relevant costs (not just headline commissions).
- The presenter claims some users may pay up to ~5x more for the “same operation” depending on broker fees and how they apply.
Costs the simulator considers (explicit framework)
When operating in the market, the simulator adds/considers:
- Broker commission (varies by broker)
- Market fees (“market rights”; e.g., Bima charges a fee regardless, and brokers pass it through)
- VAT applied to commission and/or market fees depending on the instrument
- Ability to include buy + sell together, which matters for:
- turnover strategies
- switching bonds (sell one to buy another)
Instruments / asset types covered
The simulator compares broker fees across these operation/instrument types:
- Shares (acciones) / CEDARs (treated similarly for commissions in the examples)
- Government bonds (public bonds)
- Corporate/private bonds
- Treasury bills / LECAPs (commission mechanics differ by broker)
- Repurchase agreements (repo / “repurchase agreements”)
- Dividends-related charges (fees differ by broker)
- Primary subscriptions (participation in auctions for newly issued negotiable bonds)
- Transfer of securities (moving positions between brokers without selling/rebuying)
- Broker fixed monthly plans (commission-free or reduced commission tiers)
Broker brands mentioned in the comparison
Compared across the simulator:
- Beta Capital
- Ecovalores
- Cocos Capital
- Invertir Online
- Balance
- BullMarket
- PPI
- Rava Bursátil
Also mentioned plan accounts such as IEB+ and EB+ (fixed plan notes).
Example commission rankings & key numbers (from subtitles)
1) Shares (acciones) / CEDARs — buy/sell commission rates
For buying/selling shares (acciones; CEDARs “same” in examples):
- Beta Capital: 0.15% (lowest)
- Ecovalores: 0.33%
- Cocos Capital: 0.45%
- Invertir Online / Balance / BullMarket: about 0.5%
- PPI: 0.6%
- Rava Bursátil: 0.8% (highest)
Buy example (1,000,000 ARS)
- Beta Capital total (commission + market fees + VAT on fees): 2,420 ARS
- Commission 0.15% = 1,500
- Market rights: 0.05% = 500
- VAT stated as 420 (on commission + market rights)
- Ecovalores: 4,598 ARS
- Cocos Capital: 6,050 ARS
- Rava Bursátil: 10,285 ARS
Subtitles highlight an approximate gap of ~7,900 ARS between cheapest (Beta) and most expensive (Rava) for buy only.
Important caution (turnover / “buy then sell” / switching bonds) If you do sell + buy (e.g., switching negotiable bonds to pursue higher IRR), commissions and fees accumulate and can reduce realized IRR versus what you expect from coupon/IRR alone.
2) Government bonds — VAT exemption changes totals
- Government bonds are stated as exempt from VAT, so totals can be lower versus instruments where VAT applies.
Ranking for public bonds (commission rates mentioned):
- Beta Capital: 0.15% (best)
- Cocos: 0.45%
- Ecovalores: 0.49%
- BullMarket: 0.5%
- PPI: 0.6%
- Rava: 0.8%
Buy example (1,000,000 ARS)
- The subtitles note Beta’s advantage since VAT is not applied to government bond fees.
- Differences mentioned:
- Beta vs Rava: roughly 1,600 ARS difference for buy only
- For buy + sell, the difference can roughly double (example stated ~3,200 to ~16,000 ARS)
3) Corporate/private bonds vs public bonds
- Corporate/private bonds: same commission rates, but VAT applies
- Public/government bonds: no VAT (per subtitle)
4) LECAPs (treasury bills) — comparing different commission methods
A key point: brokers report LECAP commission differently.
Two commission styles described:
- Fixed % of invested capital (annualized or prorated)
- Example broker rates cited:
- Balance: 0.10%
- Beta: 0.15%
- Rava: 0.8%
- Example broker rates cited:
- APR taken out of interest earned
- Example:
- Cocos shows 1.5%, but subtitles clarify it’s 1.5% APR charged on top of LECAP interest (i.e., effectively a cut of the yield)
- Example:
Video guidance: compare carefully by horizon:
- For short-term LECAPs (2–3 weeks), a %-of-interest approach may be competitive.
- For longer maturities, a fixed-style cost may be more predictable.
5) Repurchase agreements (repo) — annualization for comparability
Subtitles state that brokers express repo costs in different timeframes, so the simulator:
- Annualizes all repurchase agreement rates to compare apples-to-apples.
Annualized repo commission examples mentioned:
- BullMarket: 1% APR
- Beta Capital: 1.5% APR
- Invertir Online (OL): 1.8% APR
- Cocos / Balance / PPI: 2% APR
- Ecovalores: 3% APR
- Rava: 5.4% APR (called out as surprising/high)
6) Dividends — broker charges differ (and may be undesirable)
- Beta Capital: described as not charging on dividends (also described as “good” in subtitles)
Other stated dividend commission rates:
- Coital / Invertir Online: 0.25%
- Balance / BullMarket / PPI / Rava: 1%
- Ecovalores: 1.5% of dividends received
7) Primary subscriptions (auction participation)
For primary subscriptions (negotiable bond issuance / auction participation):
- Beta Capital: 0%
- BullMarket: 2.5%
- Invertir Online / Balance: 0.5%
- Cocos: 1%
- PPI: 1.5%
8) Transfer of securities (between brokers)
Subtitles explain that securities are held/deposited in a depository, and transferring avoids selling/buying twice.
Mentioned transfer fees (examples):
- Rava and Beta: no charge
- PPI: 100 ARS per instrument + 100 per share (subtitles)
- BullMarket: 500 ARS
- Invertir Online: 750 ARS
- Cocos: 10,000 ARS (per instrument)
- Ecovalores: 20,000 ARS (most expensive)
Fixed monthly plans — break-even logic
IEB+ plan example (fixed cost)
IEB+ includes:
- Free account (limits not described in detail)
- Investor plan: 5,000 ARS/month with no commissions, only market rights for:
- stocks
- bonds
- CDRs
- negotiable obligations
- treasury bills
Subtitles emphasize that whether it’s worth paying depends on your monthly trading volume.
Break-even thresholds (approximate, from subtitles)
Using examples like trade 1,000,000 ARS/month:
- Ecovalores / Beta: fixed plan likely not worth it (video suggestion)
- Cocos: may be close to breakeven around ~1,000,000 ARS/month, but only “right on the edge,” after considering VAT on plan-related items
- subtitles estimate VAT may add ~20% of the commission figure
- If you trade less than ~750,000 ARS/month:
- “It won’t be worth it” for the fixed 5,000 ARS plan approach (with possible broker-specific exceptions)
Key rule emphasized:
- A fixed plan is only worth it if you trade consistently every month; skipping months can make it inefficient.
Additional broker plan details mentioned (not a full fee table)
- Invertir Online: plans with thresholds
- normal plan for 0 to 7.5 million ARS/month
- reduced commissions between 7.5 and 50 million
- “Black plan” for >50 million
- some items reportedly have no fees at high volumes
- Beta Capital: flat plan examples
- Flat Start: 85,000 ARS
- Flat Advance: 160,000 ARS
- Flat Elite: 285,000 ARS/month (limits mentioned, plus 500 million operating cap; overdraft 320%)
- Ecovalores: example mentioned
- for high weekly volumes (subtitles: ~30 million ARS/week), commissions can drop to ~0.13%
- intraday discounts (sell/buy same day) mentioned but not detailed
Risk / performance context mentioned
The video frames “risk” mostly as cost/IRR drag:
- Trading more frequently (including buy+sells and bond switching) increases fees and can reduce realized IRR.
- It stresses not focusing only on commissions, but also:
- app usability
- customer service
- clarity of P&L/profit/loss reporting
- Mentions accounting/tax planning for larger investors (see below).
Disclosures / disclaimers (tax + advice caveats)
- No explicit “not financial advice” wording appears in the subtitles provided.
- Tax/accounting notes (Argentina):
- Described as exempt from many regulations/taxes for certain market investments
- Claims that investors can be exempt from income tax and personal assets tax when holding stocks and other assets, subject to specific cases
- Advises: for considerable amounts, consult an accountant to understand dividend and capital gains treatment
- For small amounts, suggests it may not be worth the accounting expense
Presenters / sources
- Presenter: Mati (referred to by first name; no last name provided)
- The simulator creator is the video creator (no additional external research sources cited beyond:
- referencing Bima fee schedules via a link to broker fee descriptions, without naming a specific author/source).
Rate this summary
Your feedback will help improve summaries.
Improve this summary
Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.
Translate summary in another language
Ask questions to this video
Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.