Video summary

Finance & Corporate Committee - Zoom Meeting

Main summary

Key takeaways

News and Commentary

Summary of main arguments and updates

1) Finance & governance items

  • The committee opened with apologies and confirmed the meeting order and agenda.
  • The minutes from 18 February were approved as a true and correct record, with a noted correction: one attendee’s name was missing, and would be amended.

2) Tourism sector update (Waikato District focus) — COVID impact and recovery planning

  • A tourism sector representative (Jason/Sam presenting) reported that tourism had been growing rapidly pre-COVID, including double-digit growth in visitor spending and accommodation.
  • The COVID shock drastically changed conditions.

Key drivers of decline

  • International arrivals dropped sharply due to lockdown and travel restrictions.
  • The region was already hit by loss of China group travel in late January:
    • China was the 4th-largest international market, after Australia, North America, and UK/Europe.

Impacts across Waikato

  • Accommodation, hospitality, retail, and related services experienced major reductions.
  • Many businesses moved into temporary seasonal closure (“hibernation”), while others faced permanent closure risks.
  • Job losses and business closures were highlighted, with concern that recovery support needs to extend beyond the 12-week wage subsidy period.

Airline connectivity and travel outlook

  • The presenter emphasised ongoing baseline airline connectivity (for repatriation and cargo).
  • However, restoring pre-COVID international travel levels could take years.
  • Restart plans were described as incremental, starting domestically and eventually broadening further.

Events and trading signals

  • Major events were mostly postponed rather than cancelled; some still scheduled, but international participation depends on travel restrictions.
  • Fieldays planned as an online virtual event starting 30 June for two weeks, with hope of a return in 2021.

Strategy framing: a “three-tier” tourism response

  • Mitigate (current)
    • Advocacy and operator support
    • Check-ins for 240 listed operators
    • Webinars and workforce redeployment
  • Restart
    • Planning for a domestic return (including research into domestic perceptions)
    • Business events restart campaign
    • “Shovel-ready” projects via Crown infrastructure processes
  • Reimagine (long-term)
    • Alignment with a government call to reshape tourism towards more sustainable, community-led “net benefit”
    • Moving away from “boom and bust”

Workforce redeployment examples

  • Staff redeployed from tourism employers (including those linked to major attractions) into:
    • Kiwifruit and avocado
    • Supermarkets
    • Civil defence and security
    • Food bank support

Domestic travel recovery timeline

A staged recovery was outlined as roughly:

  • 1–3 months: hyperlocal
  • 3–6 months: intraregional (drive market)
  • 6–12 months: domestic market
  • 1–2 years: international impact likely returns gradually (Australia/Pacific first)

3) Discussion and questions from committee members

Members asked about:

  • Funding partner for regional major events (Well Energy).
  • Stakeholder inclusion in “reimagining” tourism, notably Department of Conservation (confirmed as part of joint work).
  • Potential impacts on international-dependent parts of Waipa:
    • The presenter noted sports codes/events as a key international sensitivity.
    • Waipa operators were generally more domestically oriented.
  • Confidence in a pathway back through domestic travel, including:
    • Self-drive and caravan/motorhome markets
    • Regional event platforms

4) Hamilton Airport (RWA) — COVID financial/operational response and outlook

RWA’s executive team presented a COVID response shaped by the airport group’s multi-business exposure.

Operational and financial impacts

  • Aeronautical income collapsed with flight suspensions, including a major loss from the flight school.
  • Terminal closure shifted operations primarily to emergency medical service use.
  • Tenancy/property impacts occurred (mitigated by early tenant support).
  • Hotel impacts:
    • Used as a Ministry of Health isolation facility during April
    • Government payments ended shortly afterward

Measures taken

  • Early development of a pandemic plan and scenario modelling approved before lockdown.
  • Cost reductions, including payroll and director fee reductions.
  • Use of the government wage subsidy.
  • Ongoing work with hotel/operator (Jetpark) regarding restructuring and future stages.

Financial resilience narrative

  • Conservative recovery assumptions in modelling, including:
    • No meaningful Air New Zealand activity before October
    • Gradual passenger recovery
  • Diversification strategy (e.g., property/land sales) positioned as a key buffer.
  • A major conditional land sale provided margin and free cash flow to carry the group through the year and into the following period.
  • RWA stated there was no immediate need for shareholder support, and described covenant/funding as manageable in their scenario.

Capital works and funding

  • Pursued Crown Infrastructure “shovel-ready” projects for terminal redevelopment and other airport infrastructure.
  • Terminal redevelopment described as ready to commence enabling works quickly, if funding mechanisms allow.

Flight school question

  • It was suggested flight training might resume under level-based restrictions (with social distancing challenges), but timing remained uncertain.

5) LASS (regional shared services / transformation) — role, transformation approach, and COVID relevance

A new chair/co-lead (Peter/Kelvin referenced) outlined LASS’s transformation agenda:

  • Enable councils to work regionally on shared projects to reduce ratepayer burdens and improve effectiveness.
  • Deliver “transformative projects at pace” with stronger tracking, communications, and council buy-in.
  • Emphasis that LASS’s role becomes more relevant in post-COVID recovery, supporting:
    • Resilience and “security of public works”
    • “Doing more with less”
    • Staff development

Q&A themes

  • Resourcing risk:
    • Assurance that LASS sought early redeployment/support from councils.
    • Engagement with council CEOs to identify staff skillsets to keep LASS projects moving.
  • Energy/carbon management:
    • Clarification that “energy and carbon management” was not the specific election-era carbon audit referenced.
    • Related expertise could still potentially support such work.

6) LGFA (Local Government Funding Agency) — financing access, interest rates, and “green” direction

The presentation covered:

  • LGFA’s purpose: long-term financing for councils, interest savings, and access to debt markets.
  • Profit forecast: on track despite outdated SOI forecasting due to COVID.
  • Low interest rate environment:
    • Short-term borrowing possibly below 1%
    • Recent longer-term issuance at about 1.46% (implying ~1.7% for Waikato after pricing)

Market support and investor confidence

  • LGFA issued successfully during lockdown when investor risk aversion was high.
  • Confidence supports included:
    • Government standby facility rollover
    • Reserve Bank bond buying eligibility

Council-facing challenges

  • Councils may face covenant pressures in 2021 if revenues fall significantly.
  • Reduced capacity for capex cutbacks may conflict with government economic stimulus goals.

Green financing question

  • LGFA intends to offer green financing frameworks (and possibly social/sustainable categories).
  • Councils must identify qualifying green projects, and certification processes will apply.

7) Financial report (Nada / council reporting)

For end-of-March standing:

  • Income and operating expenditure as % of forecast:
    • Income ~74%
    • Operating expenditure ~72%
  • Capital expenditure and asset/receipts indicators were reviewed.
  • Health warning:
    • COVID makes the forecast column outdated.
    • A reforecast is being prepared for the next report.
  • A recommendation was passed to accept the report.

8) Health & safety report (Steve/Bev and staff representatives)

Health and safety matters reviewed:

  • Two reported trips at Cambridge entranceways were investigated; no significant cause found (likely isolated).
  • How health and safety resources are tracked:
    • Lead indicators covering spend on external health monitoring, EAP services, and training.
  • Confidence in frontline knowledge:
    • Health and safety reps and training described as active and disseminating information.
  • COVID mental/health influences:
    • The reporting period didn’t include full COVID impacts (covered only up to Nov–Feb).
    • Next report to include COVID effects.
    • Staff well-being monitoring register and level-3 workplace protocols were in development.

A recommendation was passed to accept the health & safety report.


Presenters / contributors (named in subtitles)

  • Jim (apologies reference)
  • Andrew (mover/participant)
  • Lou (participant)
  • Susan (participant)
  • Ken (chair/committee reference)
  • Hazel (apologies reference)
  • Graham
  • Bruce
  • Marcus
  • Sam
  • Jason (tourism presenter)
  • Ian (asked thanks/participant)
  • Mark Morgan (CE, Hamilton Airport presenter)
  • Scott Kendall (finance manager, Hamilton Airport)
  • Kelvin (LASS presenter, co-lead referenced)
  • Peter (LASS presenter / chair referenced)
  • Andrew (LGFA presenter, referenced as speaker)
  • Nada (financial report presenter)
  • Steve Shaw (health & safety)
  • Bev (health & safety)
  • Terry (health and well-being monitoring referenced; appears as part of the team)

Original video