Свободный мобильный интернет это к нам

Product(s) discussed

The video is mainly a comparison between two LTE/4G cellular internet setups from two brands (mentioned as Vegatel/VGATEL vs Vertel/VTS/Vertel). It focuses on panel antennas with embedded modem/router (modem-in-antenna designs) and on avoiding “whitelists/locking” to specific base stations.

---

Key features mentioned

1) Antennas + integrated equipment (directional panel)

• Panel antenna design with a plastic hermetic box housing the electronics.
• Directional antennas are used to connect to cellular LTE/4G base stations.
• Antenna categories using MIMO:
  • Vegatel-style example: MIMO 2x2 or 4x4, with more “power supply points” / RF paths.
  • Discussed example: MIMO 4x4 antenna for modern modem routers.
  • Vertel example: supports MIMO 4x4, but can fall back to 2x2 through dedicated ports.

---

2) Router vs modem inside antenna

The setups are presented as different in architecture:

• Router inside the antenna (example: Vegatel VR6 conceptually), connected via network/UTP.
• Modem inside the antenna + step-up adapter (example: Vertel VTS3X12 conceptually):
  • RJ45 is a network connection.
  • The adapter changes power: 5V to 12V to feed the external modem setup.

Why “modem inside the antenna” is emphasized as better:

• Uses thick 50-ohm axial cable with minimal losses
• Then transitions to twisted pair indoors

---

3) Cable length limits

• Modem setup: cited limitation about 10–15 m (with caution; recommended better than 10 m).
• Router via network (Ethernet/UTP): up to ~100 m without problems.

---

4) SIM placement / SIM handling

SIM placement options:

• Insert SIM in:
  • the modem-in-antenna setup (keeping RF losses low), or
• Use a SIM injector/receiver approach:
  • injector near the antenna, receiver inside the room

Constraints mentioned:

• SIM injector max length: ~7 m
• Some Vertel equipment may include a Wi‑Fi distribution module (turning the antenna into a Wi‑Fi router).

---

5) Web interface for base station selection (“locking/whitelists workaround”)

Using Vertel VTS3X12 as an example:

• The UI allows selecting/assigning base stations and highlighting sectors (with sector IDs).
• It supports locking to specific sectors, so the modem/router targets the sector likely to provide usable internet.
• Can combine carriers:
  • Example shows adding carriers (e.g., 20 MHz + 10 MHz = 30 MHz bandwidth, if available).
• Network mode selection:
  • Auto mode or forcing specific bands/technologies (e.g., LTE only).

Monitoring parameters discussed:

• RSRP, RSRQ, RSSI, SIn/SINR-like metric
• “Higher Siner/SINR is better”; an “ideal” value was mentioned as ~20, though they claim they often didn’t see it.

---

Problems / cons stated for Vegatel routers

Speakers report repeated issues with Vegatel VR4/VR6:

• Firmware/software described as “raw” / unfinished
• Reported issues after:
  • firmware updates
  • power outages / reboots
• After reboot/update:
  • settings are lost, including:
    • login/password
    • Wi‑Fi settings
• User impact:
  • must reconfigure the router “from scratch”
• They claim this was not rare: “quite a lot of appeals”
• At the time of the video:
  • they paused Vegatel router usage/sales, waiting for better support/software completion.

---

Pros claimed for Vertel modem+antenna approach

• Presented as having fewer/same problems as Vegatel (framed as an “objective” contrast).
• Base station management via UI is portrayed as straightforward:
  • selecting sectors, saving triggers restart, then locks to the intended base station
• Directional panel + sector locking is argued to help when:
  • internet works outside a facility/region but not locally
  • base station whitelisting blocks usable service
• “Excess signal” is argued to be unlikely:
  • modem transmit power is controlled by the base station
  • the panel focuses/scatters incoming signal for better reception, unlike amplifiers/repeaters that can increase transmission in harmful ways

---

Antenna/band/range compatibility points

• Antenna works only on supported frequencies:
  • If the router/modem turns on unsupported bands:
    • SWR increases
    • efficiency drops, performance degrades
• Example frequency ranges mentioned:
  • Panel example supports 1700–2700 MHz
  • Also mentioned: an 800–900 MHz variant
• A long-range band discussion:
  • They claim a band like Band 8 (900 MHz) might be present, but the antenna won’t work reliably with it due to:
    • high SWR
    • low efficiency

Direction and reflection:

• They claim panel antennas can still work via reflections (urban obstacles, mountains, partial blocking).
• Contrast with parabolic antennas:
  • parabolic beams are more easily blocked
  • reflections are less effective

They demonstrate this with analogies involving obstacles and flashlight/light blocking comparisons.

---

Example real-world setup claims (user experience)

• Demonstration scenario:
  • modem connects to a live UI (192.168.8.1)
  • shows signal metrics even indoors through reinforced concrete bars
• They state the antenna needs to be adjusted/aimed toward the base station:
  • directional angle roughly 35–45° (noted as narrower at higher gain/dB)
• Base station behavior:
  • base stations can appear/disappear in the UI list
  • better to lock to base stations that remain available
  • otherwise, the modem may show signal but no internet (base station rejects traffic)
• “Stops working after lunch” explanation:
  • service may shift to another base station due to switching/overload
  • the antenna might still be aimed at the previously working sector

---

Comparisons explicitly made

• Vegatel VR4/VR6 routers: described as software unstable; settings reset after reboots/updates.
• Vertel setup: presented as more stable, with better control via UI (sector/band/carrier selection).
• Router vs modem inside antenna design:
  • Router approach: up to ~100 m Ethernet cable
  • Modem-in-antenna: ~10–15 m max, plus ~7 m max for SIM injector
• Panel vs parabolic:
  • Panel: wider directional pattern, better tolerance of reflections
  • Parabolic: narrower beam; obstacles can block it more completely

---

Unique points list (all distinct claims made)

1. The video is a verbal comparison of two brands’ cellular equipment.
2. Vegatel routers VR4/VR6 described as “raw/unfinished business.”
3. Firmware update/power outage can cause router reboot and loss of settings (login/password/Wi‑Fi).
4. Many user complaints; Vegatel routers temporarily paused/paused usage.
5. Base station whitelists/binding can cause regions to lose internet.
6. Antennas help because they can target sectors/base stations indirectly.
7. Frequency support mismatch can degrade performance due to SWR and reduce reception/quality/power.
8. Vertel VTS3X12 supports up to 5 carriers; example uses carrier aggregation.
9. Router vs modem inside antenna design; Vertel shown as modem-in-antenna with step-up adapter (5V→12V).
10. Cable length: modem best <10 m (manufacturer mentions up to 15 m but discouraged); router Ethernet up to 100 m.
11. SIM placement options: insert SIM in modem/adapter, or use SIM injector/receiver; SIM injector max 7 m.
12. Optional Wi‑Fi module in some Vertel antenna kits.
13. Web UI at 192.168.8.1 for base station/sector selection.
14. Sector selection involves highlighting sectors and clicking save; modem/router restarts and locks.
15. Base stations can vanish from the UI list; prefer stable ones.
16. Base station may accept/deny connection based on signal quality and whitelists; weak/incorrect sector may show bars but no internet.
17. Base station switching can explain “internet works until lunch.”
18. Best antenna setup should be done during peak hours (worst conditions).
19. Base station coverage can be limited by tilting sectors (motors mentioned).
20. Antenna ranges/bands can be enabled/disabled; speeds differ by band/channel width.
21. Example: Band 3 vs Band 7 bandwidth differences can change speed.
22. Some long-range bands (e.g., 900 MHz) may be present, but the antenna may not support them reliably due to SWR/low efficiency.
23. Direction tuning with obstacles can work via reflections; parabolic antennas may fail when blocked.
24. Claims about “excess signal” being unlikely since base station controls modem power; antennas focus reception rather than transmitting like boosters.
25. They sell/assemble kits; for purchases/inquiries they direct viewers to Telegram.
26. SIM advice: recommend “normal” offers used by organizations; avoid cheap marketplace junk that works only briefly.
27. Mobile internet demand in cities attributed to expensive/unavailable wired internet (Moscow pricing ranges cited).

---

Speakers / perspectives

• Evgeny Radist (main host)
  • Introduces comparison
  • Explains Vegatel issues (firmware/settings loss)
  • Demonstrates UI-based sector locking
  • Explains technical concepts (bands, SWR, carrier aggregation, signal reflection)
• Daria (colleague behind the scenes)
  • Provides additional Q&A support
  • Offers experiential confirmation (e.g., base station/region variability)

---

Verdict / recommendation (based on the video)

• Implied recommendation: If you need stable operation and the ability to control/lock base stations/sectors to bypass whitelists, the video favors Vertel (modem-in-antenna + web UI sector selection).
• Main Vegatel drawback (as claimed): router software/firmware instability causing settings to be lost after reboot/update/power events, creating inconvenience.
• Practical requirements for Vertel (also emphasized):
  • choose a frequency-compatible antenna
  • physically aim/adjust the panel antenna
  • configure sectors thoughtfully, ideally during peak hours