Video summary
Agentic AI in Telco (Webinar)
Main summary
Key takeaways
Webinar focus: Agentic AI in Telco
The speaker frames agentic AI as the next step beyond GenAI/chatbots toward autonomous, goal-driven operations in the telecom domain. This is particularly aligned with:
- TM Forum autonomy levels (L0–L5)
- Intent-driven operations
- “Lights-out” / Dark Knock network operations
Speaker background / source
- Karim Rabia — Principal Architect at Red Hat
- Telecom experience across:
- Mobile core
- OSS / cloud orchestration
- Participation in standards/working groups
- Currently pursuing a master’s in AI
Key technological concepts, definitions, and differentiators
1) GenAI vs. agentic AI (core distinction)
- GenAI/chatbot
- Typically provides a “journey” (instructions/checklists) in response to a request.
- Agentic AI
- Breaks a goal into multi-step tasks
- Executes those tasks
- Adapts when dependencies fail
- Example: visa denied → reschedule flight
Main point: agentic AI aims to fulfill the target/goal, not just generate steps.
2) What “agentic AI / AI agent” means (as described)
The term is presented as a non-standard buzzword, but the webinar consolidates common attributes from vendors/academia:
- Goal-oriented (goal, not just a task)
- Coordination via orchestration
-
Loop-based behavior: perceive → reason → plan → act → reflect (or observe)
-
Uses data + tools Agents take actions, so they must integrate with tools/APIs.
-
Maintains state/memory across multi-step interactions
Academia criteria highlighted:
- Sets a goal
- Selects/invokes tools to pursue the goal
- Maintains memory/history/state
- Completes work fully autonomously
Agent architecture: the “Perceive–Reason–Act–Observe” loop (with telco example)
Perceive (build context)
Telco inputs referenced as context sources:
- Alarms
- KPIs
- Topology
- Inventory
- Monitoring feeds via APIs
- Runbooks/documents via RAG
- Session and long-term memory (history of prior incidents/procedures)
Protocols/tools mentioned:
- MCP (Model Context Protocol) to connect to external tools/data/inventories/repositories/etc.
Reason (LLM as the reasoning engine)
- The LLM / foundation model performs reasoning using the constructed context.
- The agent may request additional signals (e.g., “pull another KPI”).
- Reasoning correlates signals and supports:
- Diagnosis / RCA (root cause analysis)
Act (execute actions through tools)
- Actions are implemented via:
- tool/function calls
- automation/provisioning controllers
- Skills (procedural knowledge) provide domain-specific workflow steps
- Example: fault triage/rollback/provisioning playbooks
- Gated actions may require human-in-the-loop (HITL) approval if high impact.
- Example action: rollback a bad configuration parameter causing KPI degradation.
Observe (verify results and loop)
- After acting, the agent checks whether KPIs return to target baseline.
- It writes results back into memory and either:
- stops if the goal is met, or
- loops if not.
Telco momentum and standards alignment (market + autonomy ladder)
1) Adoption claims and autonomy level trend
- Cites NVIDIA “State of AI” (2024–2026 releases):
- 97% of telecom professionals using AI, mainly in operations
- Notes increasing operator statements claiming L4 autonomy adoption (nearly autonomous operations).
- Mentions telco emphasis around:
- TM Forum (autonomy framework and projects)
- 3GPP / 6G (intent-driven management/orchestration and “agentic AI in 6G use cases”)
2) Evolution to autonomy (timeline of enablers)
- 2017: Transformer paper (“Attention Is All You Need”) → foundation for LLMs
- 2017 (Telco): Zero-touch networking and service management / ZSM discussions; links to NFV / orchestration era
- 2020: “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners” → LLM mainstream
- Late 2022: ChatGPT public launch, rapid adoption (100M users in 2 months)
- 2022: 3GPP intent-driven management/orchestration specifications
- 2024: Anthropic MCP introduced for tool/context interoperability
- 2025: Google A2A (agent-to-agent) and “year of agents” as interoperability becomes feasible
- 2026: agentic AI appearing in production; agentic AI considered a 6G use case (March 2026 mentioned)
3) TM Forum autonomy ladder (L0–L5) mapped to telco concepts
- L0: manual
- L2: domain orchestration
- Maps to orchestrators like NFVO / RAN domain orchestrator
- Scripted automation/RPA-like behavior
- L3: multi-domain orchestration and end-to-end service orchestration
- Includes RAG use cases and approval gates
- L4: agentic AI + multi-agent systems → minimal human intervention
- L5: full autonomy
- Human “informed,” not “in the loop”
Telco use cases highlighted
1) Autonomous fault management / autonomous network operations
Described as:
- Detect → perceive context → reason/correlate signals → find root cause across a complex stack → propose plan → act → verify.
Complexity emphasized:
- Fault localization spans:
- passive elements
- hardware/software/middleware
- storage, networking
- data fabrics, GPUs, AI platforms, etc.
A key pain point:
- RCA is traditionally difficult
2) Proactive run-and-energy optimization (using predictive reasoning)
Example:
- When low demand occurs in a geographic area/season, reduce energy by idling/high-power site tuning.
Key points:
- Reasoning includes prediction (explicitly noted: not always LLM-based; predictive ML can drive decisions)
- Guardrails:
- Must not violate SLA / SLO
- Must verify quality of experience
- Roll back if results are not acceptable
3) “Dark Knock / Lights-out” network operations center
Defined as a TM Forum-labeled concept where a network ops center can:
- detect, diagnose, remediate, verify
- with no operator paging
Presented as a trending direction toward autonomous network operations, with multiple vendor-aligned initiatives referenced (e.g., Darktrace, Huawei ADN, Cisco intent-based operations, etc.).
Two key enabling concepts for production systems
1) Skills (procedural knowledge)
- Skills are packaged procedural workflows (described like YAML artifacts, similar to VNF packaging concepts).
- Problem solved:
- LLMs may not know domain-specific operational procedures
- If actions are random, systems can be messed up
Progressive disclosure behavior:
- The LLM first sees only name/description
- The agent loads the full skill after selection
- reduces context overload and hallucination risk
2) Interoperability between agents and tools
- A2A (agent-to-agent): agents communicate directly
- MCP (Model Context Protocol): agents connect to external tools/data (monitoring systems, KPIs, inventories, repos)
Intermediary/orchestration nuance:
In telco, multi-domain interactions often require an orchestrator layer to facilitate coordination, so direct agent-to-agent isn’t always sufficient by itself.
Takeaways (as stated)
- Agentic AI ≠ GenAI
- Agentic AI executes actions toward goals, driven by a loop (perceive–reason–act–observe).
- LLM is the reasoning engine, while tools/RAG/runtime/guardrails execute and validate.
- Context quality is critical (“garbage in, garbage out”): the agent must build accurate context.
- Guardrails + approvals exist (gated actions/HITL).
- Dark Knock is actively pursued; autonomy targets (L4 → L5) are a major telecom direction.
- The webinar claims agentic AI is no longer just roadmap:
- deployments/demonstrations are happening
- expected to grow through the 6G era
Main speakers/sources mentioned
- Speaker: Karim Rabia (Red Hat)
- Standards / industry sources: TM Forum, 3GPP, 6G (6G use case mention)
- Protocols / tech sources: Anthropic MCP, Google A2A, Linux Foundation (handover noted)
- Research papers:
- “Attention Is All You Need” (2017)
- “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners” (2020)
- Market / industry source: NVIDIA State of AI (2024–2026 releases mentioned)