Summary of "Games-Based Coaching: Do Players Actually Get Fitter?"
Games-Based Coaching in Gaelic Football and Hurling: Fitness and Effectiveness
The video explores the effectiveness of a games-based coaching approach, particularly in Gaelic football and hurling, focusing on whether players actually improve their fitness through this method. The discussion features Ken OD, a coach education manager and PhD researcher studying the physical benefits of games-based coaching.
Games-Based Coaching Overview
- Prioritizes learning through playing games rather than traditional drills.
- Emphasizes developing core skills and tactical understanding within realistic game contexts.
- Utilizes questioning, player dialogue, and social-moral environments to enhance learning.
- Includes variations such as Game Sense, Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU), Play Practice, and Tactical Games Models.
- Proven effective for improving:
- Decision-making
- Tactical understanding
- Motivation
- Enjoyment
Research Focus
Ken’s PhD research investigates the physical demands and fitness outcomes of games-based coaching sessions. The research includes:
- Two completed studies.
- A planned third study to explore how player physical and technical characteristics relate to their physical outputs during games-based training.
- The goal is to understand which fitness elements games develop well and which may require supplementary training.
Study 1 – Physical Demands of Games-Based Sessions
- Sessions designed around specific game moments (e.g., transition from defense to attack) and principles of play (e.g., give and go, third player runners).
- Included warm-ups linked to session themes, initial full-sized games, followed by modified small-sided games with tactical focuses.
- Four groups studied:
- Male adult teams
- Female adult teams
- Female youth teams
- Male youth teams
- Key findings:
- Differences in locomotor demands (distance covered, high-speed running) across groups.
- Similar cardiovascular responses, indicating consistent internal load despite external differences.
- High session-to-session variability in high-speed running metrics, reflecting the chaotic nature of games.
- Player feedback:
- Sessions were physically demanding, enjoyable, and cognitively stimulating.
- A baseline level of fitness is necessary to fully benefit from games-based training.
Study 2 – Six-Week Intervention
- Conducted with a sub-elite male adult team focusing on transitions, attacking organization, and principles of play.
- Sessions included a mix of large (10v10, 12v12) and small-sided games (4v4, 6v6) with work-to-rest ratios of 2:1.
- Results:
- Significant improvement in aerobic fitness measured by the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test (average increase of ~450m).
- No significant changes in repeated sprint ability, acceleration, linear sprint speed, or jump performance.
- Additional notes:
- Intervention used new Gaelic football rules, aiding player adaptation.
- A control group was planned but not retained, limiting comparative conclusions.
Insights and Practical Applications
- Games-based coaching effectively improves aerobic fitness and tactical skills.
- Less effective for developing speed, power, and repeated sprint ability.
- Coaches should consider supplementing games-based sessions with targeted isolated training to develop these physical qualities.
- Session design considerations:
- Maintain relative playing area to ensure representativeness and skill transfer.
- Smaller-sided games elicit higher heart rates but less high-speed running.
- Larger-sided games allow more sprinting but at lower intensity.
- Session durations and recovery times aligned with scientific recommendations (e.g., 6 minutes on/2 minutes off for large games).
- Variability in physical output across sessions and players suggests individualized or group-specific conditioning may be necessary.
Future Research (Study 3)
- Planned to examine correlations between player physical/technical profiles and their physical outputs during games-based training.
- Aims to identify which player types may be under- or overloaded by games-based sessions.
- Intended to inform better tailoring of training to player needs.
- Suggested further research areas:
- Physiological mechanisms underlying fitness improvements (central vs. peripheral adaptations).
- Deeper physiological monitoring (e.g., lactate responses).
Additional Discussion
- Zone 2 conditioning training may be overrated or misapplied in youth sports due to unclear minimum effective doses and poor transferability.
- The art of coaching—knowing how to progress, motivate, and engage players—is underrated compared to the increasing focus on technology and data.
- Recommended resource: Game Sense Coaching website by the Lavin brothers for practical guidance on games-based coaching.
Presenters and Sources
- Ken OD – Coach Education Manager, PhD Researcher
- John – Interviewer/Host
- References to researchers: Paul Kerk, Steven Harvey, Shane Malone, Shane Mang, Fraser Turlo, Martin Bashette, and others.
This summary captures the core content of the video, highlighting the structure, findings, and implications of games-based coaching for physical fitness and tactical development, as well as practical advice for coaches.
Category
Sport
Share this summary
Is the summary off?
If you think the summary is inaccurate, you can reprocess it with the latest model.