Summary of "2年間アンチコメントしてきたやつを開示請求したら親友でした。「釣り無しです」"
Overview
The video’s creator says the clip is real (not staged/clickbait) and describes long-term “anti-comments” and targeted harassment. The harassment, according to the narrator, intensified over roughly two years and included details that would realistically be known only by local people—such as names/school information, and later the disclosure of addresses. This included the narrator’s current apartment building and even past home/address details.
Key Points of the Account
-
Nature of the harassment
- The narrator claims the same person repeatedly created new profiles to continue attacking.
- They allege the harassment used a mix of insults/nasty remarks and personally identifiable information (PII).
-
Why disclosure was pursued
- After repeated incidents (including alleged address leaks), the narrator filed a legal request to disclose the commenter’s identity.
- They describe “behind-the-scenes” hints that they say only followers of restricted/secondary accounts would know—such as content related to private SNS/Live/TikTok-related posts.
-
Legal process described
- The narrator says they consulted a lawyer and went through the platform/site administrator process.
- They report that an ISP address was traced to a specific provider/subscriber.
- They estimate the process took months to about a year, describing it as time-consuming for everyone involved.
-
Who the person turned out to be
- The narrator states the identified individual was connected to (a friend/connection of) another YouTuber, who had also previously filed for disclosure.
-
Reaction to the result
- The narrator expresses shock and disgust.
- They frame the harassment as jealousy-based, tied to the narrator’s growing popularity and increased public presence compared with the harasser’s own situation.
-
Escalation warning
- The narrator says they took screenshots, saved evidence, and set their account to public to deter/warn others.
- They claim they would restrict future disclosure requests once certain boundaries are reached.
- They emphasize that if behavior crosses legal lines, it will be handled through authorities/lawyers.
-
Overall message
- The narrator argues that hateful comments can cause serious harm and urges people to stop harassment.
- They also emphasize that “anti-commenting” can have consequences for both the harasser and those around them.
Presenters / Contributors
- Hihara (video creator/narrator)
- Unspecified lawyer(s) (consulted; not named)
- Platform/site administrators (described as part of the disclosure process)
- Tsuyuri-pi / Tsusayupi (Tsusayu/Tsu-san & Yu-san, “Yuppi”) (referenced as a person connected to another YouTuber; not a direct presenter)
- SkyPeace and 3-koichi (mentioned as other YouTubers; not direct presenters)
Category
News and Commentary
Share this summary
Is the summary off?
If you think the summary is inaccurate, you can reprocess it with the latest model.
Preparing reprocess...