Summary of Investigacion 2025 03 14 08 44 GMT 03 00 Recording 2
Summary of "Investigacion 2025 03 14 08 44 GMT 03 00 Recording 2"
Main Ideas and Concepts
-
Broadening Perspectives in Health Sciences and Research
- Encouragement to look beyond superficial or habitual ways of analyzing phenomena (e.g., counting objects or focusing narrowly on one answer).
- Importance of incorporating diverse tools, senses, and ways of thinking to enrich understanding.
- Recognition that intuition and "sixth sense" in Nursing and health sciences can be valuable but are often underutilized.
- The challenge of overcoming ingrained preconceptions shaped by history, family, and culture to develop a more open, critical perspective.
-
Historical Development of Scientific Paradigms
- Science’s roots in Greek philosophy, initially mixing magical/religious explanations with early attempts at logical understanding.
- The Renaissance shift toward observation and reproducibility, separating subjective views from objective observations.
- Auguste Comte’s 19th-century Positivism emphasizing empirical validation, reproducibility, and statistical methods to establish objective scientific truths.
- Limitations of Positivism when applied to social sciences, where phenomena are not always reproducible or measurable in the same way as natural sciences.
- Emergence of social sciences questioning positivist models, especially in the mid-20th century.
-
Thomas Kuhn’s Theory of Scientific Paradigm Shifts
- Science progresses through cycles:
- Prescience/Pre-paradigm: No consensus on theory.
- Normal Science: Dominant paradigm accepted; cumulative knowledge produced.
- Anomalies: Observations that contradict the paradigm.
- Crisis: Growing anomalies cause the paradigm to be questioned.
- Revolution: New paradigm emerges (scientific revolution).
- Incommensurability: New and old paradigms are incompatible temporarily.
- New Normal Science: New paradigm becomes dominant.
- Example: Shift from geocentric (Earth-centered) to heliocentric (Sun-centered) model.
- Paradigms are transitory and scientific truth is provisional.
- Science progresses through cycles:
-
Three Major Paradigms in Knowledge Production
-
Positivist (Naturalistic/Quantitative) Paradigm:
- Reality is objective and separate from the observer.
- Emphasizes scientific method, reproducibility, statistical validation.
- Deductive reasoning: from general theory to specific observations.
- Goal: describe, explain, predict phenomena.
- Typical in natural and physical sciences and much of health sciences.
- Research types: descriptive, correlational, experimental.
-
Hermeneutic/Interpretive (Qualitative) Paradigm:
- Reality is socially constructed through language and interaction.
- Researcher interacts with the community to co-construct knowledge.
- Inductive reasoning: from specific observations to theory.
- No single method; multiple qualitative approaches exist (phenomenology, ethnography, historical research).
- Goal: understand and interpret social phenomena deeply, not predict.
- Validation through hermeneutic interpretation, not reproducibility.
-
Critical Dialectical Paradigm:
- No clear separation between researcher and reality; knowledge is influenced by power structures.
- Reality is constructed by social, economic, political superstructures.
- Knowledge grows through conflict, contradiction, and synthesis (dialectics).
- Goal: transform social reality and promote freedom.
- Research types: action research, participatory research, systematization of practice.
- Validation based on practical consequences and social change.
- Language shaped by power and institutions.
-
Positivist (Naturalistic/Quantitative) Paradigm:
-
Application to Health Sciences and Nursing
- Nursing benefits from integrating all three paradigms:
- Positivist knowledge for biological, physiological data and critical care.
- Qualitative approaches to understand patient experiences, social and cultural contexts.
- Critical paradigm to address social determinants of health and empower communities.
- Nursing is fundamentally relational and requires understanding patients beyond biological measures.
- Mixed methods research is increasingly common to capture complex phenomena comprehensively.
- Nursing benefits from integrating all three paradigms:
-
Educational and Practical Implications
- Theoretical understanding of paradigms is complex but essential for critical reading and analysis of scientific literature.
- Students and professionals should learn to identify the paradigm behind research to evaluate its applicability and transferability.
- No need to rigidly choose a paradigm; multiple paradigms can be used complementarily depending on research goals.
- Ongoing workshop series planned to deepen understanding of quantitative and qualitative research methods, bibliographic searches, and evidence-based Nursing.
Detailed Methodology / Instructions Presented
- Understanding Kuhn’s Paradigm Shift Process:
- Recogn
Category
Educational