Summary of Overview of VLSI Design Flow - II
Summary of "Overview of VLSI Design Flow - II"
This lecture continues the discussion on the VLSI Design Flow, focusing on the transition from system-level functional descriptions to RTL (Register Transfer Level) design and methods to bridge the implementation gap between high-level specifications and hardware descriptions.
Main Ideas and Concepts
- System-Level to RTL Transition
- After partitioning a system into hardware and software components, a functional specification for hardware is created.
- Functional specifications are often written in high-level languages (C, C++, SystemC, MATLAB) for flexibility and early experimentation.
- The challenge is converting this untimed, high-level functional description into a timed RTL description (Verilog, VHDL, SystemVerilog).
- This conversion is known as bridging the implementation gap, primarily because high-level specs lack timing details necessary for hardware design.
- What is RTL?
- RTL models the flow of data between registers and includes:
- Data path: Arithmetic and logical units (ALUs, adders, multipliers, gates).
- Control path: Finite State Machines (FSMs) generating control signals to direct data movement.
- RTL supports both sequential (serial) and concurrent (parallel) processing.
- Hardware Description Languages (HDLs) like Verilog and VHDL are used to describe RTL.
- RTL models the flow of data between registers and includes:
- Methods to Fill the Implementation Gap
- Manual RTL coding: Designers write RTL code manually based on the algorithm.
- IP Assembly (Reuse): Using pre-designed, pre-verified Intellectual Property (IP) blocks to assemble a system.
- Behavioral Synthesis (High-Level Synthesis): Automatic tools convert high-level functional descriptions into RTL, considering constraints like latency, resource usage, and power.
- System on Chip (SoC) Design and IP Reuse
- SoC integrates processors, memories, peripherals, analog/RF components, and embedded software on a single chip.
- Benefits of SoC:
- Improved productivity by reusing existing IP blocks.
- Lower design cost and time.
- Enables complex features on a single chip.
- IP blocks can be developed in-house or purchased from vendors.
- IP includes hardware blocks, software (RTOS, drivers), and verification components.
- Challenges in IP reuse:
- Sharing and packaging information about IP structure, configuration, and interfaces.
- Lack of uniform standards complicates IP integration.
- Ensuring configuration compatibility and consistency among multiple IP blocks.
- Integration complexity demands structured communication networks like Network on Chip (NoC) instead of ad hoc buses.
- Verification of integrated IPs is challenging due to large functional space and hardware-software co-verification.
- Behavioral Synthesis (High-Level Synthesis)
- Cost Metrics in Behavioral Synthesis
- Area: Number of hardware elements used.
- Latency: Number of clock cycles before output is valid.
- Maximum Clock Frequency: Determined by the longest combinational delay between sequential elements.
- Other metrics: Power dissipation, throughput.
- Timing and Maximum Clock Frequency
- A synchronous circuit consists of combinational and sequential elements.
- Combinational path: Signal path without any sequential elements (flip-flops, latches).
- Sequentially adjacent flip-flops: Two flip-flops connected through a combinational path.
- The clock period must be greater than the maximum combinational delay between flip-flops to ensure correct data capture.
- Maximum clock frequency \( F_{max} \leq \frac{1}{D_{max}} \), where \( D_{max} \) is the longest combinational delay.
- Example of Behavioral Synthesis
- Algorithm: \( Y = A + B + C \).
- Three RTL implementations with different trade-offs:
- RTL1: Two adders in series, latency 1 cycle, larger area, lower max frequency.
- RTL2: Two adders separated by a flip-flop, latency 2 cycles, larger area, higher max frequency.
- RTL3: One adder reused over two cycles with multiplexers, smallest area, highest latency, moderate max frequency.
- Behavioral synthesis tools choose the best implementation based on design constraints (area, latency, frequency).
- Merits and Challenges of Behavioral Synthesis
- Merits:
- Automates exploration of design alternatives.
- Merits:
Category
Educational